Why Iron Man and I had to break up
May 9, 2008 by sigaliris
I’m going to try to upload my thoughts on “Iron Man.” Yes, I know everyone else in the known universe loved this movie. I did not. If you haven’t seen the movie yet, you might prefer not to read this. Warning: language, feminism, spoilery snarling.
I wanted to love this movie. It was well-made. The visuals were snappy and there was acting. Robert Downey was hot, with the exception of that baffling, shoe-polish mustache that made me think of the mask of V. Gwyneth Paltrow kept her dignity insofar as one could. Unlike “Fantastic Four,” it did not go over the edge into campy fantasy, and unlike “X-Men,” it did not take place in an alternate world fantasy universe. It presented itself in a straightforward manner as something that could have happened in the same world we inhabit. Or, at least, the world as we see it presented on TV, where premieres and galas, wars, trips to Malibu, and other events to which we are not invited are displayed for our edification.
However. So many misogynistic and racist fantasies were embedded inextricably into its worldbuilding that I could not enjoy it. I felt that my mind was divided–half unquestioningly agog at spectacle, like the fangirl I used to be, and half wincing violently at every blatant instance of the dominant paradigm smudging every scene with its dirty bootheel.
Yes, in a way it sucks to inhabit a consciousness that has been raised to such exospheric levels. But then, it always sucked to be disincluded in the structures of power and control. It’s just that I felt that suckage less painfully when I could still numb myself by false identification with the male protagonists.
Iron Man’s putative hotness died a-borning because he was such an asshole. Case in point: He has hot monkey sex with a reporter–the film even descends to the stale, tiresome trope of having them fall off the bed to show hot it is–and then has her rudely ejected by Pepper, come morning. “Sometimes I take out the trash,” says Pepper. Come to think of it, I don’t like Pepper that much either. What a lackey. So, a (presumably) highly qualified, talented and intelligent professional woman becomes “trash” once Tony Stark has finished dumping his semen into her. This is the opposite of a pity fuck. It’s the contempt fuck, in which sex is used to dominate and invalidate a female who has dared to question the hero. She’s not invalidated, of course–except insofar as her willingness to be fucked by Tony Stark shows a pitiable weakness of mind. In spite of that, her questions were right on target. But the fact that the movie panders to those who would think that she could be invalidated by Tony Stark’s Little Iron Man shows what a piece of trash the film is.
Another character who is invalidated by the sheer overwhelming Power of the White Penis is Terrence Howard, totally wasted in the role of an Air Force officer who lets Stark treat him like a servant. Howard’s character, Rhodey, is also right on target with his critique of Stark as a pathetic, self-indulgent jerk with no sense of discipline or self-respect. But how deficient must Rhodey be in essential self-respect, when he allows this playboy to make a shuck ‘n jive, Sammy Davis personal sidekick out of him? Rhodey refers to Stark in a speech as “my great mentor.” WTF? Isn’t a mentor someone who has vital wisdom to impart? Stark has no wisdom for Rhodey, or anyone.
How could a self-respecting armed forces member fail to be offended by the portrayal of airmen in a Humvee sucking up to drunken Tony Stark like a bunch of fanboys? In a war zone, too, where they know that their lives are at stake. And I see Stan Lee is pleased to be playing Hugh Hefner now. Couldn’t they get the real Hef to do his own product placement? I suppose this killed two birds with one stone–identifying the stale cheapness of the Playboy philosophy with Stan’s comics empire. That’s a pretty clear statement that the Hefner mindset made this movie. It was only a moment in the movie, but a moment that crushed another of my illusions. Ah, but the comics themselves were not always corrupt. There were better stories to tell than the one they picked for this travesty, this betrayal of a true sense of wonder.
Oh, but Iron Man CHANGES, right? Stark has an epiphany! Yeah, right. Here’s where the movie’s approximation to reality becomes a pair of cement galoshes to drag this fantasy confection into a murky grave. The sum of Stark’s metanoia is to go back to the unnamed desert war zone and kill some more people–different people, this time. But still victims of his choosing. You don’t have to go all the way back to Viet Nam and the famous photo of a naked little girl screaming in pain and running in panic from American bombs to feel queasy about an invincible white “hero” raining down fire from on high. Images of blackened Iraqi corpses swelling in the desert sun are closer. Yes, we burn people alive in large numbers. That makes us GOOD, I guess. Works for Tony Stark, anyway.
Well, let’s see . . . doesn’t he use some of those justly famed “surgical strikes” to take out bad guys who are threatening women and children? Yes–but does he spare a moment’s thought for them once he’s done shooting? No, the scene doesn’t focus on the safety of the innocent. Instead, it lingers gloatingly on the opportunity for a large crowd of men and boys to beat another bad guy to death. Fun. What’s being defended here is not women’s and children’s right to live. The important thing is men’s right to kill. Even funky brown men can have the mandate to kill, provided it’s handed to them by a white guy.
Another brief cameo by women and children shows up in the final, laughable Battletech-style robot slugfest. A soccer mom in her SUV is dandled like a toy. She’s both comic relief and a pawn in jeopardy. Never a human being. Women in this movie are plot devices, as are non-white men. All power to the rich pale male. I sure hope Samuel L. Jackson will whup Stark’s narrow white ass. But I fear he’s doomed to be a lackey as well.
Build me an Iron Woman who works with the UN to stop arms sales and warfare and to provide refuge for displaced civilians, who has meaningful sex with equals, and who treats her employees with respect. I’ll go see that movie.
I give this review…uh…1…2…3 blue diamonds! ;-)
(I haven’t seen it yet, so, any more spoilage and I’ll just stick my fingers in my ears and yell, “LA-LA-LA-LA-LA!!!”. ;-))
Would an Iron Woman have Buns of Steel? (Duck) Seriously, we have not sen this yet but might this w/e. Will keep your review in mind. Have to run but will add later.
Steve
Back from spaghetti night with son. Sig- Is it ok to have GUY movies? If it is, how would you picture them? Your movie would have real sincere feelings. How many straight men do you think would go? If Stark had been palyed by a balck man and had a white flunky how differently would you have viewed this movie?
Steve
This is pretty well reasoned on a lot of points. I don’t think it is quite as squeak-worthy as you, & I really liked the movie, but let me make a defense of it. Simply this: Iron Man, Tony Stark, is a white male. Now, I’m willing to 100% agree with you that the proliferation of white males in comics is the result of systematic racism & sexism over the course of three-quarters of a century. Both characters & professionals. It is only now (actually, I’d say maybe it started with the original Crisis in a big way) starting to change.
The corollary to this is that…well, if you want to make a movie with Tony Stark as the main character, he’s going to be a white male. You could argue that they could have made a Rhodes Iron Man movie, but why not start at the beginning? With Tony, with the actual text of the comic. You could argue that they could have race-swapped Tony like they did with Nick Fury, but then what is the movie? “My dad the WWII weapons dealer” doesn’t make sense, & then you could argue that the portrayal of the character as a jerk would be a negative representation of whatever ethnicity you switched him for. Besides all that, the further you diverge from your source, the more danger of collapse you get into.
So looking at Pepper & Jim as “subservient” is I think a little disingenuous. Yes, they are support roles, but they are support characters. They aren’t the main protagonist of this film. Yes, that is because of a legacy of discrimination. As far as specifics go, though, I’m not going to cry foul.
Sure, the reporter gets treated like trash. Doesn’t she come back later & punch Tony Stark’s ticket? He treats her like a sex-hole, & she comes back & while he’s expecting her to be “an angry ex” or whatever, she’s pissed at his corporate practices. I thought that was an interesting tweak in the power dynamic.
Speaking of women & the power dynamic: Pepper gets herself out of trouble. I’m not saying Pepper is a super positive feminist archetype– she’s a secretary– but I certainly don’t think she’s a negative one. The same goes for Jimbo– you know, he doesn’t get as much attention, & he does get dominated by Tony, but at the same time, when the chips are down, he tells Stark to go fuck himself. So does Pepper, when Tony tries to schmooze her.
Tony Stark is portrayed as a highly charismatic asshole who slowly becomes less asshole. You know what, the idea that soldiers might be vulnerable to star factor? Um, yeah. Soldiers aren’t magical war robots, & I think that did a lot to humanize the situation. Instead of just dudes in uniforms getting blown away, the movie managed to make some kind of connection with them.
As to Iron Man as agent of violence against outsider forces– well, isn’t that the whole premise of the genre? One individuals actions succeeding where a authority group fails? One person fighting crime, or aliens, or whatever? You know? Iron Man shows up & yeah, he beats up “Terrorist Bad Guys.” & sure the fiction element is strong there– but wouldn’t it be nice if there was an easy “Iraqi Bad Guys” group to fight?
As to your statement that Brown Men have the “right to kill” provided it is handed to them by the White Man, uh…I think actually the text totally supports that reading…& demonizes it. I think, yeah, it is pretty overt that what you’d call the white guy is what the movie represents as Western Military Industrial Complex in the form of Stane & pre-change Stark. Sure, putting on your fighting robot suit to stop mis-use of arms isn’t a reasonable solution, & maybe you disagree with the argument that weapons dealing in any form is unethical– the film addresses those complexities (Tony Starks shutting down the arms dealing till he can “figure out” what to do with it) while yeah, at the same time providing a simple answer (just beat up the bad guys) as this is fiction & we’re looking for a satisfying story.
Oh & calling Jim Rhodes a shuck & jive sidekick? Woah. I don’t see that anywhere in the film. That is a pretty crazy statement– when does that happen? I mean, the rest of your racial critique I can get behind to one degree or another, but Rhodes doesn’t come across as a racial stereotype at any point. It sounds to me like inflammatory language used to reinforce a point, but to me it just undermines your other arguments.
I heart you.
You said exactly what I have been thinking. Do I need to see a comic book movie about a rich white arms dealer who rains down fire from the heavens on nameless/faceless Arab “bad guys”? And with “surgical precision” yet! So only the bad ones die! And it’s all to save the Women and Children anyway! Oh, and he also grows as a person, so it’s all good.
No thanks.
That is too much like real life.
Build me an Iron Woman. I’ll go see that movie.
You and what army?
I see where you are coming from, but part of the theme of the movie is Stark grows up. First of all, the guy gets a brutal dose of reality when he is captured and shown that his weapons can easily kill Americans as they can non-Americans. He is a man who when he isn’t busy living the dream many men wish they could (disposable Maxim cover models, fast cars, etc.) he is able to retreat into his work shop and shut out the world for hours or days at a time while his girl Friday runs interference for him. In the span of three months he begins to see just how irrelevant that lifestyle is.
This is a bit like Peter Parker’s origin in Spider Man, when he gets his powers his motives are selfish; how can he make them work for him. It is the brutal reality of Ben’s death that wakes him up.
This is a classic tool of super heroic literature, where a hero starts off as someone less than noble and strives to make themselves better, the pursuit of redemption.
Compared to Mary Jane Watson in the Spider Man movies, Pepper is head and shoulders above her. Yeah, she is Stark’s lackey. Guess what; that’s her job. I dont’ particularly like my job but it pays the bills. And she likes Stark despite his flaws. He doesn’t make passes at her, pays her well, and apparently respects her abilities enough to let her do whatever the hell she wants. She butts heads with him, talks back to him, gives him a kick in the ass early on. And who does Stark entrust to the super pacemaker transplant? Pepper.
And who saves Stark’s bacon in the end? Pepper does. She gets the information about Stane, bluffs her way past Stane out of Stark’s office, clues in SHIELD, made the trophy for Stark that saves his life, (and considering how the anti-sentimentalist Stark kept it, shows that her opinion matters) then sets off the reactor.
Rhodey’s speech? It’s the public facade. Stark is important to the military industrial complex, it pays to make it look like Rhodey loves the man. But in private Rhodey tells Stark what he really thinks. Yeah, Stark treats him like shit. But Stark comes to Rhodey when he begins the mark II project. He respects Rhodey, wants him involved.
And Rhodey’s function as Stark’s liason? Again, it’s his job. Maybe in your world you can quit your job when you think your boss or co-worker is a complete tool, but most of us are stuck with them and make the best of it.
Stark isn’t perfect by movie’s end, but he is less the spoiled man-child and someone you can actually like. At least I liked him a lot more than the booze swilling “twelve months of Maxim”, funvee riding idjit at the beginning of the film.
Tony Stark treats women, men, his customers, his co-workers, the robots and his mentor figure as a simple minded member of the “insignificant many” (as Prado put it)… but because women are included in this list you only noticed it happening to women.
My question: If you care about the woman in the SUV then why don’t you have an ounce of pity for the poor bastard who had his bike ripped out from under him so it could be used as a club?
Actually I have another question: Do you think it’s completely out of character for a power woman like Pepper to get catty when someone tries to demean her position in life?
I mean you’re getting upset about a movie that you feel is demeaning. Why is Pepper not allowed to have a one liner?
Kim– oh man, Tony Stark yelling at his robots is maybe the best, BEST part of the movie. He’s so mean to his robot! “ROBOT YOU ARE BARELY CAPABLE OF PERFORMING CYBERNETIC CARDIO-ELECTRAL SURGERY! STUPID ROBOT!” “ROBOT! GET OUT OF MY WAY, YOU ARE BARELY ACCEPTABLE HELP AT BUILDING THIS AMAZING FLYING ARMOR SUIT! ROBOT I AM TRYING TO SOLDER!” & the robot’s comeuppance with the extinguisher? & redemption with knocking the thing into Stark’s lap? Actually– is that a microcosm of the comeuppances that occur through-out the film?
Oh yes, you are so right! If only we had a totally PC movie, where only the women could make advances on the men, where men were all sexless drones serving women, and they always brought small well watered houseplants instead of dead flowers! If only anyone in the world liked a fairy tale where every character had already learned all the morals, and simply spent 2.25 hours on screen living out all that perfect simple goodness! I totally hate to see a plot with tension, or conflict (in the literary sense), or a climactic scene where good beats evil. Such a fool I am for being a male slave to 10,000 years of the tradition of narrative. It must be my evil penis making me such a fool. Oh well, guess I’ll go vote to oppress some minority now.